|
Historically, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) philosophy was primarily used in the IT sector
to evaluate purchases of hardware and software (CIO Update: To Control TCO, It Must Be
Measured and Managed, Bill Kirwin, Gartner Research, April 2003). The primary practitioners
of this art were usually affiliated with the Finance or Accounting functional areas. While
using Total Cost of Ownership to evaluate a given unit of hardware, software or other capital
expenditure is commonplace, up until now it has not been a common business practice to
apply TCO to evaluate the marketing value chain. By using this process to evaluate internally
what is truly delivering business value to consumers, companies can gain a much better
understanding of how to both extract costs out of their existing model, and improve
revenues through greatly increasing the speed to value of their marketing programs.
|
|
|
TCO is an asset based philosophy, and its focus is to provide an understanding of both
direct and indirect costs related to a specific purchase or program. For example, the TCO of
a car isn’t only the price paid for the car. It includes the gas, maintenance, and insurance
fees over the period of time the car is in use. For a marketing program, it is very important
to thoroughly evaluate both direct and indirect costs when looking at an overall marketing
program. In almost every case there are hidden people costs that impact the profitability
and effectiveness of the overall program.
|
|
In almost every case there are hidden people costs that impact the profitability and effectiveness of the overall program.
|
When discussing TCO and the Marketing Value Chain, the purpose is to consider each activity
in marketing, from front end activities such as market research and segmentation/targeting,
through traditional back end activities such as response analytics. Ideally every marketing
program functions like a continuous feedback loop. In this fashion companies learn which
strategies and tactics proved most successful, and theoretically can use the results of prior
campaigns to adjust and make intelligent decisions for future marketing initiatives. The power
of tools such as response analytics are well documented, very recently in the January 2006
issue of Harvard Business Review in an article titled “Competing on Analytics” (Competing on
Analytics, Harvard Business Review, January 2006).
No matter what industry you are in today, it will be an ongoing challenge to gain the correct
answers to the following questions about your current marketing program:
- What key components drive customer retention in my business?
- What key components drive customer acquisition in my business?
- How can I make it easier for our company to gain an understanding quickly
of both customer retention and acquisition?
- How can I change my current program so that my information feedback loop
provides me with a speed advantage over my competition?
- How can I translate the myriad of data I receive into actionable knowledge?
Understanding these challenges and executing will be a critical component of extracting
the maximum value of a company’s marketing value chain on both the revenue and
expense side of the equation.
|
|
|
|
Each company’s marketing value chain can vary widely based upon industry, size of
organization, overall business strategy, product mix, and distribution to name a few. Contrary
to popular belief, there is no one size fits all software or toolset that can single handedly lower
the overall TCO of your marketing efforts. Only a focused, concerted effort to gain a true
holistic picture of the entire marketing process can lead to a major impact on both sides of
the revenue/expense equation. However, once the TCO exercise is completed once, it is
much easier to maintain for the long term. Properly applied, the approach can deliver a very
strong competitive advantage in the marketplace.
|
|
|
|
From our experience at Raine Media in applying the TCO approach with our clients, we have
observed several common trends that prove to be hurdles in removing cost.
|
|
|
|
In order to answer the customer retention and acquisition questions raised in the first part of
this document, there must be an understanding of how each component of the marketing
program is adding value. Mapping out the current business process is the first critical step,
but it isn’t the problem. It’s the arrows between the individual processes and how each task
connects to the other critical tasks that pose the greatest challenge. There are too many
different ways to do the exact same task, and the integration of each system or process is
convoluted at best, if it works at all. Value is being lost due to the “mystery of the arrows,”
because no one can efficiently tie the pictures together. Until the “mystery” is solved, it will
be difficult to determine not only the total cost involved, but will also cloud the picture of
what pieces of marketing infrastructure can be either replaced at a cheaper cost or are no
longer necessary.
|
|
|
A company’s marketing infrastructure must be analyzed to determine where and how much
redundancy exists, and how each component of the infrastructure is adding value to the
marketing organization.
At Raine Media we have seen infrastructure duplication a common problem facing our
clients. During one client engagement we uncovered the fact that over forty “marketing”
databases existed in various corporate silos within the organization, which were all
primarily serving the same purpose. While this is an extreme example, many companies
have a number of software packages in their organization that perform the same function.
Whether homegrown or purchased, these systems have an associated cost. A large part
of the TCO process is determining how much overlap exists, then track how much is being
spent to keep all of these systems running.
|
|
|
|
A marketing department must have a holistic view of the entire marketing value chain in order
to maximize the possible efficiencies. This includes not only the functional areas within a given
company, but also all of the vendors that play a large part in the marketing process. Marketing
departments sometimes lose sight of the big picture because everyone is focused on their
area of expertise in order to implement pieces of the value chain. These areas of expertise
(such as market research, brand marketing, direct marketing, database marketing, data
analytics, print and fulfillment specialists) are critical to an organization’s marketing success.
The TCO approach creates an understanding of how all the individual pieces work together
to add value to the consumer.
|
|
A marketing department must have a holistic view of the entire marketing value chain in order to maximize the possible efficiencies.
|
|
Companies are often surprised at how many people it truly takes to run a viable marketing
program, as well as how many hours are hidden in tasks that have become routine to the
people actually doing the tasks. However, people are many times both a companies most
valuable and expensive resources. The amount of time the person spends on a task that
could be automated translates directly into dollars. A very detailed TCO approach begins
to tell a story of what portions of a particular plan can be automated as well as provide the
economic profile of all areas of marketing.
|
|
|
|
The data about ones customers is one of the most strategic assets for an organization
because it cannot be duplicated by a competitor. With the decreased cost of data
storage over the past several years, an abundance of data has been stored away. The
amount of data available is not the problem. However, the ability to transform data
into actionable knowledge is a much more complex task. Without the infrastructure
components in place to learn from prior marketing campaigns and events, the marketing
department is severely handicapped and unable to leverage this strategic asset.
While many companies understand that this is indeed a problem needing to be fixed, these
same companies need help to execute. They understand the “Why,” but the “How” is the
area that can befuddle even the most experienced marketing professionals.
|
|
|
|
The companion challenge to data everywhere is the lack of a data strategy.
Collecting data from disparate systems into a single view is a sizable piece of the puzzle.
For a discipline such as response analytics to work, a concerted effort must be taken to
think about which pieces of data are truly the most relevant from a strategy perspective.
The TCO approach helps to identify the high cost of not having a strategy in place to learn
from prior marketing campaigns or events.
|
|
|
|
If you decide to perform TCO on your company’s Marketing Value Chain, the following
section outlines recommendations that will help prepare your organization to begin to take
a fresh look at the marketing process.
|
|
|
|
Before trying to connect all of the dots of your existing marketing infrastructure and begin to
attack the “Mystery of the Arrows,” you must first understand where all the dots are. It is very
important to take the first step in understanding what currently exists, as well as the associated
cost structure. This exercise led many of our clients to realize they had several software
packages doing essentially the same thing. Companies have been able to reduce 30% or
more of their ongoing cost structures by eliminating redundancy through this exercise.
|
|
|
|
By evaluating existing cost structures and utilizing modeling approaches, such as optimization
models and strategic outcome models, it becomes easy to complete scenario planning
to determine the best of numerous strategies to lower costs while increasing results.
|
|
|
|
Becoming more cost effective in serving existing customers, targeting prospects, and
continually building customer loyalty is the name of the game. An important piece in
creating a continuous feedback loop is integrating response analytics or other
techniques such as data profile analysis into your marketing strategy. In addition to some
of the standard approaches such as predictive modeling, cutting edge techniques such
as neural net modeling, econometrics, and multi-attribute utility theory are now being
brought onto the marketing playing field (Competing on Analytics, Harvard Business
Review, January 2006). Where your company falls in the marketing maturity stage will
determine which technique adds the most business value, but having a way to learn and
gain actionable knowledge from each marketing interaction with consumers is key to
building customer loyalty in a cost effective way.
|
|
Where your
company falls
in the marketing
maturity stage
will determine
which technique
adds the most
business value.
|
The importance of strategic vendor relationships has never been more important in
today’s business environment. With supply chains spanning across the globe, numerous vendors
play key roles in any organizations marketing success. Integrating vendor interaction into
a common platform improves information flow and increases the speed of which
actionable knowledge is acted upon.
For example, Raine Media created systems that connected a marketing agency, a call center,
the client’s direct marketing team, and the print and fulfillment vendor in a single application.
Because the application was a role based system, each vendor was only able to see the parts of
the marketing value chain that impacted their business. However, the client’s marketing team
was able to see across the entire value chain with a few clicks of a mouse. Digital Marketing
Dashboards were put in place to translate the data into actionable knowledge, which greatly
increased the speed of decision making. As a side effect, because activities were open to the
marketing department, much more collaboration between vendors was now possible. The
marketing department was able to take full advantage of this compression of the marketing
supply chain to lower their TCO.
|
|
|
|
How each activity within your organization adds value to how you serve customers is
important to understand. This can also lead to understanding what components could be
either eliminated to cut costs, or supplemented for potential revenue impact.
|
|
|
|
Once completed, it is important to evaluate the TCO of your marketing efforts periodically,
at a minimum of once per year. By placing processes in place to lower the chances of inefficiency
being introduced into the program, the ongoing investment of time is relatively low.
|
|
|
|
In order to create a large market opportunity, you must take a look at non-customers and
look for needs unmet by existing product or service offerings (Blue Ocean Strategy, Kim
and Mauborgne, Harvard Business School Press, 2005). By utilizing a data strategy and
segmentation approach, you can gain the benefit of better understanding of your existing
customers. You also gain perspective on prospects and begin to form hypothesis of why certain
prospective customers aren’t responding to your offering. This is exactly why continuous
learning is so important to a marketing organizations success.
|
|
|
Make no mistake, utilizing a Total Cost of Ownership approach to your marketing value
chain is not always for the faint of heart. In order to capitalize on the possible costs savings
and efficiency gains, many times an initial investment is required. However, with careful
consideration of both direct and indirect costs, a true competitive advantage can be
gained, which will consequently contribute to a healthy bottom line for years to come.
If you would like to know more about the TCO approach or would like to share your
experiences, please contact Raine Media Inc. We have Solution Consultants who can
provide expertise in all areas of your marketing value chain.
|
|
|
Raine Media is a management consultancy specializing in
helping its clients achieve market differentiation by building
effective customer information strategies. Raine leverages
its research and analytical capabilities, data technology
resources, and its detailed knowledge of a wide number of
industries to build and deploy innovative solutions to solve
business performance challenges.
For more information, please visit rainemedia.com
|
|
|